review


I can’t really pinpoint the moment when, nor can I definitively state the reason why I stopped taking Arcade Fire seriously.

Possibly: it had something to do with their proclivity for stating their case in the most theatrical way possible.
Probably: it had something to do with the fact that I’m kind of cynical and didn’t want to get my hopes too high.
Definitely: it had something to do with their very overrated, overcooked, and pedantic sophomore effort, Neon Bible.

But I don’t know when I reached the place where I found myself two weeks ago: a place where I actually scoffed at the prospect of another Arcade Fire.  I had already relegated them to the bargain bin of my musical taste – the same general place as Julian Casablancas recently earned a spot, and the same place where Devendra Banhart has been forever.

I knew The Suburbs was going to be a shitty record.  And there was a good amount of preliminary evidence to support my claim.  First, its subject matter is a pretty clear return to the focus of the first album: the emotional crises of the most mundane corner of the developed world: our neighborhood.  The whole record was so clear a reference to the “Neighborhood” songs that it smacked of a band late in its career trying to claw its way back to earlier triumphs after some ill-advised forays into sweeping, but ultimately stock, sociopolitical claims.

Then there was the length of the damn thing.  I mean, for Christ’s sake, it’s over an hour long, with sixteen tracks.  I conceived of that as an effort to throw a lot of shit and hope something stuck.

On the whole, I was pretty wrong about The Suburbs.

It’s an immersive, beautiful effort, as close to a return to Funeral form as anyone has any right or reason to hope for.  The production is clean and revealing, evoking more Britt Daniel than David Byrne.  “Modern Man” weds the fragile power of Win Butler’s voice with winsome, crisp guitars.  The Suburbs doesn’t seek to recreate the symphonic intimacy of Funeral, nor to artificially expand it (like Neon Bible); rather, it redefines it, cleans it up.  It doesn’t really sound like the band were thinking, “Hey, we need to top Funeral,” while recording this album (a feeling that permeated most of Neon Bible).  They have expanded their range of influences beyond Talking Heads, liberally invoking such diverse source material as George Gershwin (on the title track) and Depeche Mode, like on “Half Light II (No Celebration)” and “Sprawl II (Mountains Beyond Mountains)”.

On The Suburbs, the band still have their opinions, but they present them with more resignation, as though they’re just a little tired.  As a result, they conflate – to magnificent effect – their political discontent with their social and personal malaise.  On the wonderful “City With No Children”, Butler sighs, “Dreamt I drove home to Houston / on a highway that was underground. / There was no light that we could see / as we listened to the sound / of the engine failing.”

I will say that the album is perhaps a bit long.  It’s tough, because I would have been reluctant to cut any of these songs.  But more than an hour of music gets pretty exhausting, by any standards.  Despite this, The Suburbs is a consistently engaging effort.  Arcade Fire pull this off by keeping things stylistically fresh and generally more upbeat.  This is a record where they draw from a much broader sonic pool, which, in the end, makes the whole thing much deeper.

Ultimately, I think my attitude was the product of a more general trend in music today where we are quick to turn on our favorite acts, where we almost prefer a band to go down in flames and fall from grace than to actually have a consistently successful career.  Whatever the cause, this is the part where I have to try and save face and explain away my incorrect prediction about the future of this band.  So I’ll say that Arcade Fire are back.  But it’s unclear to me at this point whether they were really as gone as I thought they were.

8.6 / 10.0

There’s a group at every high school that would sit around at lunch engaged in ferocious arguments about the best Pink Floyd song, or about which album was really the fulcrum of Led Zeppelin’s career, or just raving about The Beatles.  The members of this group inspired simultaneous envy and scorn from the outside world.  Envy because they seemed so intimately connected and familiar with this bygone era, but scorn because their music knowledge had, somewhere along the line, morphed into blind prejudice (you know it as rock snobbery); they were incapable of appreciating anything that wasn’t released in the 60s or 70s.

It was this group of people that popped into my head when I first spun Innerspeaker, the debut from Australian rockers Tame Impala.  Maybe it’s because I suspected that the members of this band were also the rock snobs at their high school.  I can see Kevin Parker and company hunched over turkey sandwiches snorting at a joke about “some indie shit” or something like that.

On its own, that would be pretty frustrating, but unlike most of rock snobs in my life, Tame Impala have actually channeled that love of the 60s and 70s into one of the best records of 2010.  Innerspeaker has a decidedly vintage feel: Kevin Parker’s reverb-soaked, strategically double-tracked vocals (that bear a borderline creepy sonic and inflective resemblance to John Lennon), the narcotic guitars, and the generally drugged out atmosphere.  Save for the sort of muscular, unmistakably modern drums found on “Alter Ego” and on much of the album, Innerspeaker could pass for some lost cut from the late 60s.  Their guitar work is clearly Zeppelin-inspired, while their vocals are unmistakably Beatles (see “Solitude is Bliss”).

What makes Innerspeaker most similar to the stuff released in the 60s though, is that it seems to reject the modern music market patterns.  There is no single; no one song that people will buy over all the others.  And that’s not to say that the songs aren’t catchy or good.  It’s just that the album was conceived as a unit, such that the sum of its parts is way less than the whole.  Sgt. Pepper’s Lonely Hearts Club Band is, in many ways, the closest period corollary I can think of in that regard, where none of the singles (“Penny Lane” and “Strawberry Fields Forever”) were actually on the album.  This is an album for the vinyl age, not the digital one – it is long, involved, and demanding, but also engaging and rewarding.  On future releases, it will probably benefit Tame Impala to bring something that is decidedly their own to the table.  But for now, Tame Impala pull all this off with an urgent genuineness that makes their (probably) pretentious intent a lot more palatable.  Rock snobs everywhere, take note.

8.7 / 10.0

I really fucking hate Bruce Springsteen.  And I really don’t want to have this fight with you, but l think his rise to superstardom was the beginning of the end for music.  It marked the real beginning of the era in which we have come to conflate marketability with musical talent.  Bruce Springsteen looked like a rock star, so we believed he was one.  If Bruce Springsteen looked like Seth Rogen, I promise you he would be in the bargain bin.

A lot of people think the amount of Springsteen-inspired bands on the rise today prove me wrong.  A wealth of popular bands incorporate the Boss into their sound – some less (The National) and some more (The Gaslight Anthem).  But what Bruce fans argue is that the very fact that he’s so all over the place is proof of his Beatles-esque significance.

I look at it a different way.  While Free Energy’s debut, Stuck on Nothing, certainly does evoke Bruce Springsteen, I hear it and think, “Wow, this is the sort of thing Bruce Springsteen would have written if he had more musical talent than a bag of old sandwiches.”  I don’t view these bands so much as the products of Springsteen so much as corrections to all the mistakes he made.  Springsteen wanted to be a classic rock guitar rocker, but fell too much into the production vogue of his time; all his music sounds decidedly 80s.  Free Energy, on the other hand, don’t seem to pay much attention to what’s popular now.  Their music is riff driven pop music that is clearly the product of their understanding of classic rock.  It’s not a modern construction.  Free Energy set out to put out a 70s style rock album in the vein of The Cars and Journey, and they did just that, ignoring the lo-fi, surfy, sample-heavy fads of this age (credit James Murphy for that production restraint).

This is never clearer than on the fabulous standout track “Bang Pop”.  In my mind, it’s a breakthrough piece for the DFA’s cred; it shows they’re the top of more than just esoteric dance music.  It is a straight up and down raw diamond of pop rock, with a riff that outshines its influences, and a vocal hook that you’ll be singing for literally weeks.  But the whole album is catchy as fuck, it will stick in your mind like the gum on the cover (that’s symbolism, kids).  It’s a summer record through and through, and it’s a lesson to all you Springsteen acolytes out there: wake the fuck up.

7.8 / 10.0

It’s been an unusually big couple of years for compilations with the words “dark” and “night” in the title; you might remember last year’s Dessner brothers-curated Dark Was the Night swept this publication off its proverbial feet.  In 2010, super-producer Danger Mouse and the late Sparklehorse nucleus Mark Linkous present Dark Night of the Soul.

At the risk of sounding like some pseudo-intellectual douche, the album is richened by an understanding of the etymology of the term itself.  In a spiritual context, “dark night of the soul” implies a state of hopeless isolation, which explains the themes of stagnancy and introspection that permeate the music.  The poem of the same name by Saint John of the Cross (is kind of fucked up, and) chronicles the soul’s overnight trip from the body to a union with God.  Listening to the album with that in mind really darkens shit up, because it’s not tough to frame it as a chronicle of Mark Linkous’ soul’s journey from his body to heaven.

Danger Mouse and Mark Linkous wrote all the cuts on Dark Night of the Soul, with help from a stylistically diverse group of indie A-listers.  As you might expect, that gives the tracks on this album the feeling of being different on the surface but fundamentally similar.  Intangibly, this is a coherent project; but it is outwardly pretty disjointed.  The opening track, “Revenge”, finds the weird effects and echoed, tortured vocals that are characteristic of the Flaming Lips coupled with the instrumentation (bells, scratchy drums) and sparse production style of Danger Mouse’s more subdued projects.  Like a lot of the album, it sounds okay enough, but it’s pretty heavy-handed, thematically.  It seems that Linkous and Burton don’t trust their audience’s ability to read between the lines.  “You can’t hide what you intend; / it glows in the dark,” Coyne warns.  It’s clear that Linkous and Burton’s intent is for this record to be a game-changer.  I won’t say it couldn’t be, but only because it’s a pretty good idea, not because it’s particularly well-executed.

Dark Night of the Soul’s strongest facet by far is its production.  Musically, it’s more hit or miss.  The wavering, watery organs and slow measure of the Jason Lytle-bolstered “Jaykub” is the album’s surprising runaway standout.  Other far more likely heroes – Gruff Rhys, Julian Casablancas, Black Francis, and James Mercer – fail to deliver really compelling work, instead doing more stylistic hints (at best, Black Francis) and straight-up caricature (at worst, Julian Casablancas – jesus it’s awful) than real contributions.  What we get here is fundamentally Linkous/Burton fare, with splashes of other people’s influence added (in-studio, by the sound of it, if I’m being cynical).

Mark Linkous’ death was a tragedy.  His work as Sparklehorse certainly did not sound finished, and we missed out on a lifetime of great talent.  Brian “Danger Mouse” Burton is also a talent in his own right, and a self-made man to boot.  His ascendancy is well-deserved.  But their collaboration on Dark Night of the Soul is anathema to their respective identities; it sounds rushed and slapdash rather than carefully constructed, obvious rather than nuanced.  While it shouldn’t engender questions of whether these guys were/are really that talented after all (they were/are), it is not the masterpiece it probably could have been.  It might change the game, but only because people will try again with the aim of fixing the mistakes made here.

5.2 / 10.0

The whole supergroup thing has to be kind of inconvenient, in a way, right?  Like, nobody’s happy if you just put out a good record.  It has to be great.  Super, even.  A for instance: if Challengers had been the debut album from some unknown Montreal or Brooklyn band, that band would have been hailed as the second coming of Christ.  But it was put out by the New Pornographers, and we all expect better from them.  I mean, come on – they’ve got A.C. Newman, Neko Case, and Dan Bejar!  They should be putting out ass-kickers, like every time.

So Broken Social Scene’s new record, Forgiveness Rock Record, hit shelves with a whole lot of expectations on its back.  And they respond by tackling the big shit.  This record’s title isn’t some clever gimmick.  It’s a statement of thematic intent.  Aggressive?  Yes.  But they do a good job with it.  It’s a heady subject, forgiveness.  It ranks up there with the most complex human emotions, and a lot of times, it’s harder to figure out what leads us to forgive people who have hurt us than it is to understand what makes us love them in the first place.  The record reflects this tension; it’s a sprawling, reflective affair.

Forgiveness opens on a strong note, with the stunning symphony “World Sick”.  Kevin Drew complains, “I get world sick every time I take a step.”  The next track, “Chase Scene” is pretty obviously the work of Brendan Canning with its churning intensity, scratchy drums, and vocal performances anchored by ostinato melody and dissonant harmonies.  “Sentimental X’s” is a late standout, a slow-burning brooder, that builds up to anticlimax after anticlimax before finally releasing itself in the last minute and a half or so.

There’s a lot going on in Forgiveness Rock Record – sometimes too much.  As willing as I generally am to give Broken Social Scene the benefit of every musical doubt, I’m not always convinced that everything that happens here is deliberate; things tend to sound a bit haphazard sometime, like the record is getting away from them.  “Highway Slipper Jam” is misplaced and half-baked.  “Sweetest Kill” starts strong, but then drags on towards the end.  But the weird thing is that the intent is always clear.  The ideas shine through even when they’re poorly executed.  Don’t ask me how.  I’ve written that out like fifty times, and can’t think of a clearer way to express it.  Take a hint from the record, and forgive me.  And them.

8.0 / 10.0

Mike Hadreas is freaking me out.  His debut album as Perfume Genius is one gloomy son of a bitch.  I mean, it is out and out harrowing.  Before I even get into whether I liked it or not, just know that it’s an emotional ordeal, and Hadreas never lets up with the simple daggers of self-loathing.  And I don’t mean that in an endearing, quasi-humorous Frightened Rabbit kind of way.  I mean it in a “Holy shit, I kind of want to slit my wrists after listening to this fucking record,” kind of way.

But I digress.

Learning is the record I imagine Bon Iver putting out if he had a less powerful voice, lived in Seattle (where it always rains) instead of Wisconsin (where it’s beautiful and snowy and shit), and was way more emotionally disturbed.  It’s a hazy, rain-slicked lo-fi dreamscape of a record.  Hadreas allows us to hear every inch of the recording.  He hides nothing – musically and lyrically.  The iconic “Mr. Peterson,” a gut-wrenching tale of sexual abuse and suicide exemplifies this best: lilting, reluctant piano, distant, boyish vocals.  What really sticks out is the juxtaposition between the innocent sweetness of Hadreas’s voice with the utterly fucked up subject matter about which he consistently sings: “He made me a tape of Joy Division / He told me there was a part of him missing / When I was 16 / he jumped off a building.”

That’s the good news.

Now, there’s no question Hadreas is a talented cat, and his music is deeply, deeply affecting stuff.  But as a record, Learning is just too monotonous to warrant real acclaim.  It’s noteworthy in that it marks the arrival of a great new songwriter, but it is blemished by Hadreas’s lack of experience and versatility.  His attempts to break the mold (like on the ill-advised “Gay Angels”) fall flat; they sound forced and out of context.

That’s the bad news.

The bottom line is that Learning is a record that’s worth a listen, and the prospect of seeing Hadreas pout and pound these tunes out is an admittedly alluring one.  But as it stands, I think his best days are in front of him.  Musically.  Based on the lyrics on this album, I struggle to see how his life can get much worse.

6.9 / 10.0

Menomena’s new record starts with an almost sterile mix of squeaky-clean ostinato Strat, crisp drums, plucky bass, and a kind of affable melody not found on their previous record.  It’s, well, kinda, like, poppy.  That is, the band wastes no time establishing the fact that they were not going to just put out another esoteric (genius) experimental folk piece like Friend and Foe.  To be sure, Mines, their third record is by far their most deliberate, conventional, and sure, mature, effort yet.  This is a proper rock record.  These songs are not amorphous, but concrete pop works.  There is none of the disconcerting production touches found on “Wet and Rusting”; the tracks rarely venture into the runny intensity of “Muscle ‘n Flo”.

As much as Friend and Foe‘s impulsive production quality and impromptu song structure found Menomena making it look easy to treat an album as a laboratory, to do it as you go and still come out with something wonderful, Mines is a testament to their relevance as a straight ahead rock band.  The band focuses less upon raw atmosphere here and more upon melodic craft and song structure.  It all seems more carefully thought-out, more premeditated.

But somehow, Menomena manage to dial back their weirdnesses without making it boring.  “TAOS” still features a gorgeous bridge that melts effortlessly into a clattering chorus/finale.  “Killemall” follows, dark and ethereal, but always grounded; driven by an inspired bassline, with piano dripped in and out periodically.  The recognizable production touches and impulsive flourishes that make Menomena so recognizable, as well as the three extremely distinctive wails of all three members, are all here, but they’re contained and displayed more coherently on this record than ever before, and it makes for a much more satisfying listening experience, even if it’s not as relentlessly immersive as Friend and Foe.

I can’t imagine fans of Menomena not loving every minute of this record.  What I can readily believe, though, is that what many skeptics found missing on Friend and Foe – the elusive “accessibility” factor – they will find in Mines.  As a pure rock record, it’s Menomena’s best work, and it proves they’re more than just a bunch of mad scientists.

8.7 / 10.0

In the early 2000s, the East Coast – primarily New York – was the engine of the music scene in the United States.  New bands like Interpol and The Strokes were the key players in changing the direction of music.  Now, a decade later, the West Coast seems to be having its day.  Wherever bands come from, many incorporate into a beachy, wave-riding lo-fi, uniquely Californian flair – think Wavves, Real Estate, Surfer Blood, and even Local Natives, just to name a few.

The Angelino duo of Bethany Cosentino and Bobb Bruno, or Best Coast, is a product of – and actually kind of an archetype for – this movement.  Detractors will write them off as caricature, and it’s hard to out and out refute that characterization, especially if this kind of music just isn’t your bag.  But for the rest of us, there is no denying that their debut, Crazy for You, is a real charmer, and that you’ll only like it more with each subsequent listen.

Best Coast are obviously dedicated students of the retro surf-rock trade.  All the stylistic elements are here: fuzzy, jangly Danelectro, reverb-kissed vocals, and unobtrusive, compliant drums.  The songs are structurally quite simple.  They aren’t detailed landscapes or slow-burners; they’re quick snapshots.  She introduces ideas and then moves on just as quickly (the longest track is just over three minutes).  That keeps things pretty fresh, allowing her to get away with a lack of variety.  But the greatest moments on Crazy for You are those when Best Coast make an honest effort at shaking things up melodically, harmonically, or chordally – like on the sexy, Bangles-esque chorus of “The End” or throughout the gorgeous, smoldering “Honey”.

The lyrics are certainly the weak point of Crazy for You.  Rather than toeing the line between nostalgia and modern edge, Cosentino strays too far and too often into the realm of juvenile.  What we can glean is that she’s immature, insecure, a touch clingy, lonely, and spends a lot of her time waiting by the phone.  To be sure, she uses a lot of the very same lines (“you say that we’re just friends,” “I want this to the end,” “I wait by the phone”) all over the album, but the thematic material is so simplistic, that this convention doesn’t add cohesion, it just makes things sound repetitive.  But there are a couple good moments to be found here: On “Goodbye,” Cosentino tackles her overdependence with elegant simplicity: “Every time you leave this house, everything falls apart,” she laments.

I can readily imagine some people getting turned off by this album’s almost willful lyrical juvenility.  But don’t oversimplify things.  Behind the veil of immaturity, there are some pretty clear descriptions of some pretty complex emotions.  Whether that’s the product of luck or skill or inexperience or whatever is up for debate.  And still others will argue this album is derivative and monotonous, and that these ideas can be found, better executed, elsewhere.  But that too is kind of a rash undersell (and I frankly just don’t think it’s true; musically and stylistically, this is a really well-executed record).  It’s not a revolutionary work, but Crazy for You gets better with every listen, and on the whole, it’s a good album to see out the waning days of summer.

7.9 / 10.0

http://www.everyview.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/tristan-clopet.jpgWe’ve all had our rock star fantasy.  What separates us is how far we’ve taken it.  Some people keep it confined to their shower, singing their hearts out to and putting on quite a show for invisible – but no less adoring – crowds.  Others actually pick up a guitar and clumsily cover Dave Matthews and Jack Johnson songs in their dorm room to get laid by their pick of dewy-eyed girls in college.  Still others write their own music, grow their hair out a little bit, and carry around a notebook where they “write their ideas as they come” in Sharpie or something.  Then, there are the performers.  The bravest, the most narcissistic of them all: they write their music and assemble people to execute their vision, and then they put themselves on the chopping block to be evaluated.  Why?  Because in these people, the dream burns the hottest.  They want so badly to find themselves on the real stage, with the real crowd, that they will allow themselves to be cut down one hundred times just to get that one shot at the big leagues.

That last type of person generally has one act that inspires them.  It’s the act they constantly try to emulate, but will never mention as an influence.  This influence, weirdly, isn’t always conscious.  A lot of times, it’s something that just happens.  For Tristan Clopêt and the Juice, this corollary is clearly, obviously the Red Hot Chili Peppers.  I’m not saying that they are trying to ape the Chilis, but while listening to their Purple EP, I got the distinct sense that they were the most comfortable on this album when that’s what they were doing.  What do they do best?  Rhythmically focused, airtight jams, the stuff that goes on between the verses.  They love the punch of plucky bass and drums and classic rock riffs.  Clopêt spits out his lyrics on most of the album in a sassy Anthony Kiedis sing/speak/shout, while the churning, fuzz bass and sharp drums anchor him down.  If I said it’s my thing, I’d be lying.  But they do it with verve, and they do it with passion, and occasionally, like on the coming-up-from-underwater intro of “Black Panther Party” they do it with some style.

But maybe they were nervous about being written off as just one-dimensional Guitar Heroics, because they throw in a couple of slow jams, including the emotional fulcrum “So Alive” and the piano-splashed “Love and a Question”.  But these down-tempo moments are the weakest moments on the album, where the band strays from their strengths and into the realm of contrived, overbearing power ballads.  These two songs are weighted down by all the crocodile tears, and it’s not a good color for the band: “Oh, one thing I never knew / was what I was to you,” Clopêt gripes, on “Love and a Question”.  This is perhaps an attempt at heart-on-sleeve candor, but it comes off more as pre-packaged rock star sentimentality.  Juxtaposed against the rest of the EP, it’s about as believable as John Mayer singing about how he never gets laid.

I can appreciate what Clopêt and company were going for here, and maybe they even hit the target they were aiming at.  It impressed me in a purely technical sense.  The songwriting showed potential but almost every one of these songs needed a good once over and a solid edit.  If they had paid half as much attention to writing the songs as they did to executing them, this would have been a much more successful record.  Their arrangements feature all kinds of flourishes and fills that belie how much these guys are aching to get in front of a crowd and show their chops off.  And live, these songs would undoubtedly translate, and probably improve.  But in my headphones, Purple EP is this weird paradox.  It sounds like a first draft and a victory lap at the same time, two things which I had heretofore assumed were mututally exclusive.  I was frustrated by the Purple EP; the band is really good at getting the most out of their ideas, but the ideas themselves seem lazily conceived.

Of course, I would say literally the exact same thing about the Red Hot Chili Peppers too (and a lot of other wildly successful artists, for that matter), and look where they got.

6.0 / 10.0

http://www.mbvmusic.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/wild-nothing-gemini-cover-art.jpg“You’ve got some charm, I must admit.”

So croons Jack Tatum on “Summer Holiday”, a standout track on his latest album as Wild Nothing, Gemini.  More than just a kitschy 80s sentiment, it’s a pretty good encapsulation of what this record has to offer.  Tatum is a skilled enough craftsman, but his charm is in his almost religious adherence to the pop gods of the 80s, and those who have followed in their wake.  If you swiped Tatum’s iPod, I can basically guarantee you’d see it dominated by The Smiths, and his favorite recent band would probably be The Pains of Being Pure at Heart, with perhaps a couple songs by The Shins.  Oh yeah, and Loveless is probably on there.  Come to think of it, if you want to know what kind of music Jack Tatum listens to, just listen to Gemini.  It’s a nice little stylistic burrito; incorporating an array of influences that are pretty easy to trace, and resulting in a charming, if not particularly creative, forty minutes and change.

I don’t want to come down on the guy too hard, mind you.  This is a really good record.  Tatum is undoubtedly an extremely skilled songwriter, and Gemini is a mystifying record, with sunny hooks swirling and drenched in a hazy shoegaze blur.  I’d venture to say he beats The Pains of Being Pure at Heart at their own game, in a lot of ways – the most prominent of which being that the songs are way, way better.

But if anyone tells you this is anything (significantly) more than pastiche, they’re misleading you.  Like, I honestly thought I was listening to a Smiths’ record sometimes (not least during the last forty-five seconds or so of “Bored Games”).  Tatum does a good job evoking Johnny Marr, but in the end, that’s really all he’s doing.  Gemini beautifully reincarnates past masters, but ultimately doesn’t really bring all that much of its own to the table.  To really make an impression, Tatum will have to step out of the shadow of his influences and show us his chops as an artist, not just an imitator.  Because just like in the world of painting, people who can’t make it on their own forge the work of the masters.  It may be a charming forgery, but it’s a forgery.

7.3 / 10.0

Next Page »