review


http://fat-cat.co.uk/fatcat/images/news/1257.jpgOur culture is fascinated with other people’s misery.  We relish the downfalls of our celebrities and politicians, mesmerized with perverse, fascinated joy.  We’re all guilty of it, albeit to varying degrees.  Tiger Woods, Eliot Spitzer, Mark Sanford, David Vitter, Bill Clinton, Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie and Jennifer Aniston.  Odds are, you recognize at least five names on that list, and I’m willing to bet you’ll stop reading this review to Google the ones you don’t recognize.

This attitude weasels its way into every corner of our lives.  It’s why emo music was so disgustingly successful for a few dark years there.  Glasgow folk outfit (now a quintet) Frightened Rabbit’s last record, Midnight Organ Fight, owes a good deal of its success to the fact that it brimmed with a raw, wounded self-loathing.  In fact, that sort of melodramatically low self-esteem was the very heart of that record.  It’s what made it so damn appealing to so damn many people – it was emo for people who hated listening to emo (and those fucking emo kids).  Sure, it was relatable, but it was more just kind of incredible to hear someone sing about himself with such passionate contempt.  The band managed not only to strike a chord with its listeners, but also to satisfy this almost voyeuristic, escapist impulse within all of us to bear witness to someone else’s private struggles, as if doing that would somehow blunt the force of our own personal failings.  It was the musical equivalent of watching someone’s personal life collapse right before your eyes – we could feel comforted, we could feel empathy, we could commune with Scott Hutchinson in his misery.  When the news broke about the follow-up, The Winter of Mixed Drinks, I was with a friend of mine, and one of us made a half-joking comment about how excited we were to hear Scott Hutchinson singing about his precipitous descent into post-breakup alcoholism.

Weirdly, though, The Winter of Mixed Drinks is about as clean a break as I could imagine from Midnight Organ Fight – it’s way richer, way more polished, and way less self-deprecating.  This might sound at first blush like a big step down to people who loved Midnight Organ Fight, but it’s actually more of a tradeoff.  It changes the whole emotional atmosphere of the album – less passionate but more thoughtful and arguably even more heartfelt.  So from an atmospheric perspective, this album takes a very different and unfamiliar kind of tack, but still manages to get the job done.

Musically, the most noticeable change on this album is that it lacks the tribal, muscular drumming of Midnight Organ Fight.  The drums no longer dominate the mix, so this album has a way less percussive feel.  That’s appropriate, from a thematic and critical standpoint, but still a little disappointing from a fan’s perspective, given how badass the drumming was on Midnight Organ Fight.  The phenomenal album centerpiece “The Wrestle” still incorporates a little pounding snare, evoking memories of “The Modern Leper,” but for the most part, Grant Hutchinson is a little more restrained on this record.  Other than that, this is a big step forward for this band – motifs emerge and re-emerge on this record without sounding trite or repetitive, and their dynamic sense has progressed miles.  Scott Hutchinson still manages pathos-rich vocal performances – thank God – so it’s still unmistakably Frightened Rabbit.

If Midnight Organ Fight was the teary-eyed tantrum that immediately follows a breakup, then The Winter of Mixed Drinks is the weary resigned sadness that nobody sees but everybody feels.  This record trades heart-on-sleeve appeals for pity for detached perspective.  In almost every sense, The Winter of Mixed Drinks is the perfect follow up to Midnight Organ Fight.  It’s like the band is continuing the story rather than just repeating it.  Good.  A story’s never as good the second time anyway.

8.7 / 10.0

http://image3.examiner.com/images/blog/EXID33295/images/resized_morning_benders.jpgFrom the faux-gramophone opening of The Morning Benders’ effort, Big Echo, it’s pretty clear where the hearts of this Berkeley-based outfit lie – in the 50s.  But they’re clearly children of the modern age, and they’ve clearly incorporated the here and now into their sound.  This album is dosed with a strong shot of shoegaze, which generates a sort of surreal atmosphere.  It’s that contrast between the old and the new that The Morning Benders explore on Big Echo: think My Bloody Valentine covering “Earth Angel” and the like, and you’re on the right track.  The sleepy, deliciously over-the-doo-wop-top “Excuses”, with its soaring violins and its lilting backing harmonies might be mistaken for a 50s radio hit, were it not for the massive amounts of reverb-y atmosphere that makes it a much more dreamy, blurry affair.

Like “Excuses”, this record is full of gauzy guitars and twinkly-eyed nostalgia complicated by modern production touches.  On “Promises,” singer Chris Chu waxes poetic in his dreamy tenor about how “we grow up too fast,” but in the next breath says he knows “this won’t last a second longer than it has”.  The Morning Benders seem to be in a place where they themselves don’t know whether to abandon their idealism or cling to it all the more furiously, and it infuses all their songs with a desperate joy that’s tough to resist.

This is a deceptively complex and mature effort. For the most part, they pull off the whole doo-wop/shoegaze combination naturally enough that it’s easy to forget just how unnatural a combination it really is – at least on paper.  It’s not perfect, of course; the record suffers at moments like “Mason Jar”, a dreary drag that too fully explores not interesting enough musical ideas.  But by and large, this is a very engaging, very intriguing, and very promising effort.  The Morning Benders have a lot to say, and they have a very novel, daring way of saying it.  And that’s a good thing in any decade.

8.2 / 10.0

If we’re all being honest, it’s tough to say that any of us really expected MGMT to not suck forever after releasing the massively overrated Oracular Spectacular.  The only difference between then and now is a really big and unfortunate one – much like their fellow ill-fated sophomores, MGMT has begun to believe their own mythology.  The result is the circus freak joke that is “Flash Delirium”.  It’s like “Electric Feel”, if you take away everything that was good about “Electric Feel” and make it the exact opposite.  It’s overcooked, oozing a pretentious, contrived energy.  The song lacks any sort of memorable melodic figure – it’s a mess of clumsy synths, stale drums, and atrocious lyrics.  Is there really a chanted second verse?  Like, did I actually hear that?  And is that followed by a stilted flute solo?  Is all of this actually happening?  Or waaaaaait, maybe this just a case of “Flash Delirium”?  Yeah, that could be it.  Oh that flash delirium.  I just can’t control it! 

Seriously, if anyone can honestly tell me with a straight face that listening to this song instead of literally any song on Oracular Spectacular is not a complete waste of time, then I’d love to hear that, so I could know to completely disregard your musical opinion in the future.

I smell a sophomore slump a-cookin’.  Or maybe that’s just the smell of this shit sandwich song.

0.4 / 5.0

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_mIDxsiKmEL8/S20-DcN5uTI/AAAAAAAABAI/GsPnHCzUsXs/s320/NewsomHaveOneOnMe.jpgIf there’s one word to describe Joanna Newsom (besides hot – don’t judge me), it’s got to be “fascinating”.  Of course, trying to describe her in one word is all but impossible; complexity is an essential element of her style.  But I think the reason that “fascinating” is such an appropriate word because it’s neither complimentary nor pejorative.  Have One On Me, much like its predecessor Ys, is always interesting, never boring.

Newsom is a restless songwriter and performer.  Her songs often transform and evolve, and her arrangements are gregarious and adventurous.  She seems to almost fear the conventional and the typical.  Right from the beginning of this mammoth, two-hour affair, Newsom seems pretty skittish; “Easy” cautiously experiments with a litany of backing instruments, never letting any one get too comfortable with its place in the mix.  And while it’s not always so explicit, this album definitely has a fluidity that makes its length (three discs, fuck) much more manageable – or maybe I should say much less exhausting.

But Have One On Me isn’t just “fresh” or “interesting”.  It’s “fascinating”.  Sometimes, Newsom missteps and missteps badly.  While the record is certainly almost always engaging, Newsom struggles to anchor herself down in a song.  The result is a record (or three) that sound erratic and unfocused.  What’s more, each song is pretty inconsistent: there are moments of brilliance but also instances of boredom or just downright grating motifs.  Vocally, Newsom’s voice sort of oscillates between cherubic and a little annoying (see the title track…shiver).  Even when she does dedicate herself to an idea and give it the time it needs, she sounds uncomfortable, as if she was in a room full of people she didn’t know.

Joanna Newsom is certainly one of the most interesting artists around today.  She’s unapologetically unique and innovative.  And that makes for some really gorgeous, inspiring moments.  But in the end, my biggest qualm with Have One On Me is this: sometimes, her music is just downright unpleasant to listen to – overwrought and undeniably pretentious.  And sure, I don’t doubt that both of those are pretty intentional on Newsom’s part, but unfortunately, she doesn’t seem to know where to draw the line, and ends up crossing over into pretty unpleasant caricature too often.  But again, no one should be heard to say that Joanna Newsom is losing any points in the artistic integrity department.  But there’s more to artistry than just integrity. I don’t want a record that’s only going to make me scratch my goddamn head; I want something that I’ll actually enjoy listening to.  If we’re using enjoyment as a metric for the quality of her work, Have One On Me definitely leaves something to be desired.

6.7 / 10.0

http://betterpropaganda.com/images/artwork/Golden_Archipelago-Shearwater_480.jpgIt’s always nice to see a band really come into their own.  Shearwater’s tough to root against too, especially because frontman Jonathan Meiburg left a great thing (Okkervil River) behind to completely commit to what had previously been just a side project.  It was a risky commitment, one that took some serious stones, and that in and of itself is praiseworthy.  But with the bafflingly gorgeous Rook, it certainly seemed to have turned out pretty fabulously for everyone involved.

The big challenge facing Shearwater in following Rook was to prove that their artistic impulses could lead to a sustainable career.  Would they manage to stay interesting and provocative on a follow-up, or would they offer the same tricks again, and sound dry and hollow?  This question never left my head as I listened to The Golden Archipelago, their ambitious follow-up.

This record is ultimately defined (and differentiated from its predecessor) by its relative restraint.  Rook was a temperamental record, hot-blooded and impetuous.  It moved effortlessly from the wistful lows of “I Was a Cloud” to the furious churn of “Century Eyes”, covering every inch of ground between the two extremes without being overbearing or sacrificing cohesion.  The Golden Archipelago, by contrast, is a far more placid affair; a sort of secretive allure permeates the whole record, hinting at but never quite revealing something simmering under the surface, or hidden behind the trees.  The gentle pitch bend of the guitar “Landscape at Speed” listens like a ride along a measured current, but the climax we kind of expect never arrives, and the song offers sustained tension instead of resolution.

Where Rook sought to express a wide breadth of emotions, The Golden Archipelago offers a portrait of a world that is entirely the product of Meiburg’s imagination.  The themes of mystery, majesty, and yeah, the ocean, run pretty consistently throughout this record, but it’s all presented in a pretty reserved way.  “Corridors” is undoubtedly the most prominent departure from the serenity of the record, and while it’s surely an attempt at a climactic catharsis, it comes off more as a bad-natured tantrum.  It’s a fine song, just very, very out of place.  “God Made Me” fares better; it builds to a climax rather than just sprinting out of the gates.

But like any world, The Golden Archipelago has its constraints, norms and inherent limits: not everything is allowed, not everything makes sense in the context of the atmosphere of the album.  That is, in creating their own living system, the band kind of painted themselves into a corner from a stylistic standpoint: things that would have worked on Rook don’t work well here.  To be sure, though, that also has benefits.  Rook might have had better songs and a better showcase of the group’s versatility, but The Golden Archipelago hangs together much better as an album.  It’s far more cohesive, far more logical in its flow and progression, more thematically unified.  In a singles-driven world, Shearwater have put out a proper album.

Just so we’re clear, I think The Golden Archipelago is a really impressive album, even if it lacks the sort of jaw-dropping moments that Rook offered in excess.  But I have to say, it doesn’t really sound like Meiburg and company were trying to drop any jaws here.  Rather, it seems they were trying to create a whole, immersive world for their listeners to occupy.  And for better or for worse, they’ve done that.

8.2 / 10.0

http://www.morrmusic.com/backstage/files/mm097_12x12_LOWRES.jpgAt first blush, Seabear might just seem like a pretty typical whispery Scandinavian folk outfit.  Many point to their relatively conventional songwriting, their usually safe chord progressions, and their use of a tenuous grasp on the English language as an endearing kind of advantage.  But I have argued, in public and private, that Seabear’s 2007 effort, The Ghost That Carried Us Away, was a very underrated album.  It had an intangible, secure quality to it that made it instantly familiar.  In that respect, it was very different from the usual vanilla folk that was so common ever since Sufjan got huge.  But even I was surprised by what they came up with next.

The songs on We Built a Fire, the band’s excellent follow-up, seem longer than they are, but for the first time, I don’t mean that in a bad way.  Rather, it just seems like the group are able to fit a lot of ideas into relatively (surprisingly) short spans of time without ever making things sound cluttered or rushed.  “Fire Dies Down” is a sprawling two part affair; the first half incorporates some Andrew Bird-inspired whistling to complement a pristine mix of shimmering, watery piano, delicate fingerpicked guitar, violin, silvery backing harmonies, and Sindri Már Sigfússon’s whispery tenor.  The song’s second half picks up the tempo a little bit, introducing churning drums and a generally busier mix.

As a songwriter, Sigfússon chooses to experiment with his structural ideas rather than his musical ones.  The chord progressions and melodic impulses will be pleasantly familiar to those acquainted with The Ghost That Carried Us Away.  What is really surprising here is just how much the band manages to get out of them.  These songs seem much more rich than anything on Ghost.  The songs evolve more than you might expect.  “Cold Summer” is a beautiful, melancholy cut, featuring ostinato piano, barely there Stratocaster, plaintive strings, and the best, most gorgeously judicious use of brass I’ve heard in recent memory from any band not called The National.  And while the song would have been excellent had it just stayed put, it ventures over to mind-blowing by swelling into in the last two minutes to a quiet catharsis.

Everything fits together beautifully, save for the occasional misstep, like the too rustic “Wooden Teeth”.  And while this song does interrupt the flow the album the album seemed to be settling into before that, it’s not an unpleasant break.  Sure, it’s a little too cute if you listen to it on its own, but as a follow-up to the brooding, ethereal songs that precede it, it works just fine.  So in the context of the album, these flaws are almost excusable. We Built a Fire clocks in at over an hour; it needs the diversity it brings to be listenable.  “Leafmask” evokes the earthy honesty of Iron and Wine, while the very next song, “Softship”, is shimmery, delicate, reluctantly effusive pop.

Like I said, this is certainly not what I expected from Seabear.  It’s an adventurous, expansive offering, as rich and rewarding a listen as it is surprising.  It’s inventive without being overbearing, curious without being obnoxious.  The band maintains their subtle intensity, but also deepens their musical sensibility, so We Built a Fire is actually a much more intense and satisfying listen than The Ghost That Carried Us Away.  A little more musical evolution (as opposed to just structural experiments) would have probably pushed this record over the top, but such as it is, it’s tough to complain.  And they’re definitely still safe from being branded as average in any way.

8.2 / 10.0

http://www.brooklynvegan.com/img/music2/shoutwork.jpgAfter the first two tracks of their debut, Stockholm’s Shout Out Louds haven’t really put out anything worth listening to.  It’s a harrowing statistic.  I often wonder why I keep going back to them, considering they have offered so little of quality.  But then I remember the thrill that went shooting up my spine when I listened to the first two tracks of their debut.  It’s a thrill that never returned – not for the rest of their debut, and nowhere on their dreadful second album.  I’m starting to think those two tracks might have been teasingly situated flukes.  But in case I’m wrong, I keep going back to everything they put out, and you’d be surprised how hopeful I still manage to be.

I’ll spare you the suspense.  Their third album, the ominously titled Work, doesn’t recover that thrill.  In fact, I’m starting to think that delicious sizzle that bristled through the speakers during those two tracks is almost beyond recovery.  Maybe it was just luck.  But regardless, the title of their third album is unfortunately apt.  To even hint at the wide-eyed wonder of those two tracks (which they rarely do on this album), they sound like they’re Working pretty hard.  The delivery is too restrained, too cautiously self-aware.  But since recklessness was so much a part of what made the band fun to listen to in the first place, this is a pretty significant deficit.  And there are just blatant fuck-ups.  “Four By Four” is straight confusing; the transitions between the verses and the chorus are ridiculous.  The whole thing seems half-baked, as if it was cobbled hastily together at the last minute with some stray ideas they had lying around.

Production-wise, it’s kind of a disaster.  I would like to meet the person who told the Shout Out Louds that they had a career as an arena rock band.  And then I would like slap that person in the face.  Work is overwrought and over-thought, the band tries to use the production as a means by which to bolster relatively simple musical ideas, but it ends up just sapping whatever appeal they might have had otherwise.  “Play the Game” ruins a pretty decent chorus hook by constantly bringing insultingly fake sounding cello into the mix and descending into static repetition instead of offering any kind of bridge.  “The Candle Burned Out” is a melodramatic bore, where clumsy floor toms and too-punchy guitar lead the way as the song overstays its welcome.  The last minute of the song is a pretty contrived and predictable attempt at a rising storm of a coda, but it sounds more like a series of musical sneezes than a storm.  The biggest sin is “Paper Moon”, where the fake cello reemerges and is coupled with goofy pizzicato strings and a stilted vocal melody.  It’s frankly painful.

I mean, okay: it’s not all bad.  Opening track “1999” is a little bit of a Phoenix rip off in more ways than one, but there are bigger sins that one could commit, I suppose.  Plus, the song has a good punchy feel to it.  “Throwing Stones” fares a bit better too, by keeping it simple and letting the melody and Adam Olenius’s still interesting voice do the majority of the Work.  “Show Me Something New” is the surprising standout, introducing an energy into the album that wasn’t there before, and it’s a welcome change.  It evokes memories of the frantic, unhinged joy that was so characteristic of their best Work.

The band still has strengths, and those strengths are still really interesting.  The problem is that they emerge so rarely, and never as clearly as they did all those years ago on those two magical tracks.  “Is it true what they say about us, that the walls are closing in?”  Olenius wonders on “Paper Moon”.  It very well may be.  Since their debut, Shout Out Louds seem to have been moving in a direction that is less and less suited to what they’re good at.  If they keep going, obviously, they will have fewer and fewer options in the future, and can only expect to Work harder and yield less impressive results down the road.

4.9 / 10.0

http://newmedia.kcrw.com/musicnews/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/LOCAL-NATIVES-GORILLA-MANOR.jpgHere’s a brain teaser for you: name one great band to come out of L.A. in the past few years that didn’t get their start in The Smell.

I’ll wait.

(If you say Silversun Pickups, I’ll fucking kill you.)

I know; it’s hard – almost depressingly so if you’re an L.A. native.

You might understand, then, why I’m personally so goddamn excited about Local Natives.  If you judged them by their album title, they’d be really goofy and shitty.  Thankfully, we don’t have to do that.  So let’s just ignore that their debut is called Gorilla Manor and focus on the fact that it’s pretty damn brilliant: sunny and introspective, sophisticated and uncomplicated.

The songcraft is phenomenally inventive.  Their instrumentation and melodic impulses are wonderful and fresh (if not completely earth shattering).  They rely heavily on harmonies, using perfect intervals to add texture and depth.  Matt Frazier’s percussion is a central aspect of the band’s sound, which evokes a more gritty, urban iteration of Fleet Foxes, or if you prefer, a less annoying version of Vampire Weekend.  But Gorilla Manor indicates that Local Natives have more of a natural ear for a hook than either of those bands, more of a natural musical sensibility that frees them from the monotony to which Fleet Foxes sometimes fall prey, and the reliance on gimmicky production tricks to which Vampire Weekend always falls prey.

It’s structurally that this group really makes waves.  “Airplanes” is constantly changing, starting out as good-natured piano vamp before morphing into a rich, gorgeous violin-kissed symphony, all held together by the masterful chorus: “I want you back, back back,” Taylor Rice wails above the churning drums that become familiar by the record’s end.  “Sun Hands” starts out as a whispery secret of a song but quickly introduces a churning guitar solo by way of a brief, passionate drum-and-vocals bridge where Rice straight up screams, before melting back into meandering Stratocaster tinged with wilted piano.

Gorilla Manor navigates its sonic peaks and valleys really effortlessly, whether it’s between songs or within them.  “Camera Talk” is a rollicking stomp that somehow seems perfectly at home next to “Cards & Quarters”, a shuffling, brooding cut that finds Taylor Rice coming about as close to crooning as you could reasonably imagine.  “Warning Sign” starts out delivering a similar mood, albeit a little more harmonically rich, but occasionally veers into a “Neighborhood 2 (Laika)”-inspired chorus.  Generally speaking, the second half of the album is more subdued than the first, but that raw, honest energy that makes the album so immediate and vital is present all the way through.

It’s possible that I’m biased because this group is from L.A.  You can make the ultimate judgment.  But I think this band makes L.A. honestly relevant again in the world of indie music at large (rather than just in the noise niche), and I think you’d be making a big fat mistake to not immediately purchase and listen to Gorilla Manor.  It’s a stunning debut, and even though it’s early, it’s a safe bet that you’ll find it somewhere – and probably somewhere high – on this blog’s Album of the Year list.

9.5 / 10.0

http://blog.audiocurrent.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/The-Soft-Pack.jpgSomewhere, Elvis Costello is smirking.  He’s not even dead yet, and his influence is becoming increasingly noticeable in music today.  Lots of groups are picking up their Fenders and starting to emulate Costello’s power-first, pop-second brand of power-pop.  That’s great.  Of course, in any movement, there will be greatness, there will be garbage, and there will be everything in between.  The Soft Pack are closer to the great end of things, but definitely, decidedly, aren’t there.  They’re for sure, at times (it seems) almost by design, in the middle of the pack (oof, pardon the pun).  They’re not pure Costello, mind you – there’s definitely, definitely a very healthy splash of the Ramones in there as well.

Opening track “C’mon” is full of the sort of uncomplicated gusto that is so characteristic of this album.  They don’t waste too much time on crafting actual melodies, but they make up (at least in part) for this lack of musicality by sounding like they’re having a genuinely good time.  There’s a sort of endearing lack of refinement and nuance to this music that makes it easier to swallow.  The lyrics are never particularly creative, but also never sophomoric or too painfully cliché.  I know this will sound shitty, but The Soft Pack seem so comfortable with being in the middle of the road, that they make it sound kind of stylish.

The album as a whole, as well as the songs on it, is a bit one-dimensional, but the band knows how to keep things brief, never dwelling too long on any one idea before briskly on.  This is a blessing and a curse; because while it means that the bas moments never have a chance to really, really take hold and start to piss you off, it also means the best ideas are never fully fleshed out, like the intriguing, Hammond-touched “Move Along”, that almost evokes The Doors played in fast-forward.

The Soft Pack are kind of a one-trick pony.  This album won’t reveal all that much to you with subsequent listens, but that’s not necessarily a bad thing.  It’s nice to have music that can be appreciated at face value.  If you’re looking for deep artistic fulfillment, then this is one to skip (and check out Surfer Blood instead), but if you’re looking for something to play at your next party that isn’t LCD Soundsystem or Phoenix, this is a worthy alternative – even if it doesn’t manage to balance sophistication with spunk they way those other two acts seem to do so effortlessly.  But on the whole, I’d say it’d be a bad decision to totally write these guys off.   There’s nothing wrong with having a good time.

7.2 / 10.0

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_BwtBUmwXrKA/SucCJwUsTTI/AAAAAAAAGcI/RQdoJT7irEo/s400/midlake.jpgIf you wrack your brain, you might be able to remember Midlake.  They’re a group that has been tirelessly touring a record they released in 2006.  It was called The Trials of Van Occupanther.  It’s been almost four years since that record was released, and now, we have the follow-up.  With that much of a gap, it’s tough to not expect a thing or two.  It’s not like Van Occupanther was that mind-shattering a record, either.  It was good enough, sure; but it was essentially a droopier iteration of Fleetwood Mac.  Even so, I came to The Courage of Others expecting serious progress.  After the better part of four years, you better bring something new (and worth a damn) to the table.

First things first: this record probably won’t (and definitely shouldn’t) draw as many Fleetwood Mac comparisons.  Here, Tim Smith and company have entered more of a folk mentality.  They seem more comfortable with that kind of sound.  Opening track, “Acts of Man” seems far more organic than anything on Van Occupanther.  And that feeling holds; this record feels way less forced than its predecessor, much more the product of natural impulses rather than an homage to a bunch of disparate influences.  “Fortune” is an honest, sunny, finger-picked folk tune.  It seems appropriate that this record places such thematic focus on the juxtaposition between the manmade and the natural – it’s a comparison that could very easily be applied to their last record and this one.  Sure, the same mossy electric guitars make their fair share of appearances, but for the most part, Courage feels less like pastiche or imitation and more like something genuinely different.  The judicious use of flutes and the almost constant use of vocal harmonies make this recognizably the work of Midlake, but most of the similarities are just skin deep.

In terms of the songwriting, the band has reverted to a more conventional style, relying less on building tension than on sound structures and well thought-out chord progressions.  This, for better and for worse, certainly makes listening less of an adventure.  The songs are more predictable, but also more sensible.  Plus, the simpler songs help the band focus on atmosphere and execution.  While it might not sound that different from Van Occupanther, it’s got a sort of quietly symphonic air about it that Midlake has never brought to the table.  This is never clearer than on the excellent “Core of Nature”.

So the question remains: does The Courage of Others live up to the expectations I had for it?  Not completely.  It would have been hard for it to do so.  It definitely doesn’t sound like the product of three years and change of work.  This is a record that I would have been impressed with a year and a half after Van Occupanther.  And while I understand that they were touring for a while, I can’t help feeling a little let down.  If you’re only going to release a record as often as the Olympics happen, you had better make a little more progress than Midlake do here.  But that this record sounds like it didn’t take a lot of time is also among its biggest strengths.  It is a less self-aware version of this group.  Instead of sounding like a sad sack version of Fleetwood Mac, now they just sound like, well, Midlake.

8.1 / 10.0

Next Page »